Thursday, February 25, 2021
  • Contact
Pension Changes
  • Government Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
No Result
View All Result
Pension Changes
Home Pension Information

Wyoming’s Only Public Employee Pension System Flouts State Transparency Law

May 31, 2020
in Pension Information
Wyoming’s Only Public Employee Pension System Flouts State Transparency Law
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Cheyenne Frontier Days Rodeo

CHEYENNE, WY – JULY 23: Bull rider Jimy Marten rides during the Frontier Days Rodeo on July 23, 2017 … [+] in Cheyenne, Wyoming. (Photo by Ronald C. Modra/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The wildest rodeo in Cheyenne this year looks like it’ll be the transparency battle brewing in the state capitol.

Recently, the Wyoming Retirement System (WRS) rejected our sunshine request for public employee pension information. We wanted to know who is getting how much after working for how long from which public body.

Related posts

Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation newsletter – July 2020

PABEW meeting minutes, 29 January 2020

February 18, 2021

State pension rise will go ahead in 2021

February 9, 2021

Now, the WRS (the only pension system in the state), the new Public Records Ombudsman, the Governor, the Attorney General, and the legislature’s Judiciary Committee are all involved.

It’s a standoff.

State statutes are clear – public employee information is a matter of public record. But the WRS pension board created their own rule which barred the release of member information. Then, they rejected our sunshine request.

It shouldn’t take a search warrant, subpoena, or litigation to unveil public employee salaries or pension payouts. And the pension board’s decision sets up an even larger legal fight over transparency in Wyoming.

The powerful must be held accountable—no matter which party controls the legislature. For example, our organization at OpenTheBooks.com recently published at Forbes robust oversight reports on the pay and pension systems in California, Illinois, and New York. 

In Wyoming, our local partners include the Wyoming Equality State Taxpayers Association, Bill Doenz, Kevin Lewis, state representative Garry Piiparinen, state senator Tom James and attorney Drake Hill.

We work with local leaders because we know that transparency is important in every state. Here are three reasons it should be a priority in Wyoming:

First, WRS has 34,873 active state employees and 27,782 pensioners. The membership represents roughly one in every five wage earners in the state. Taxpayer-funded government is a major force. 

Second, the WRS rejection forced our organization to file sunshine requests with 600 local units of Wyoming government. That’s unnecessary. Those local governments, then, had to produce records, and our auditors spent countless hours compiling those records and posting them online.

Instead of filing 600 requests, we should be able to get all public employee salary and pension records from a single request to the WRS. That would save hard-earned taxpayer money, not to mention donor funding for our non-profit transparency organization.

Third, the WRS rejection is bad precedent. State transparency laws cannot be overwritten by other units of government.

Last month, WRS partially reversed their position and decided to release all the information except the employee/retiree name. They cited an exemption in the Wyoming statutes related to “trade secrets, privileged information and confidential commercial information.”

Clearly, the names of retirees are neither trade secrets nor confidential. In fact, names of employees of the State of Wyoming are specifically a public record and are even published in state directories.

We reached out to Governor Mark Gordon who appoints WRS trustees. The WRS rejection letter included Gordon’s name across the masthead. Further, the governor appointed the Attorney General whose job it is to enforce state statutes and give agencies legal advice.

Gordon also appointed the first ever Public Records Ombudsman, i.e. transparency czar, Ruth Van Mark. The legislature appropriated $125,000 for the position according to senate disclosures.

So, rather than immediately suing WRS in court, we decided to appeal the rejection to the new ombudsman. Van Mark closed our case without any notice. After the Judiciary Committee started asking questions, Van Mark then re-opened our case.

We reached out to Van Mark for comment. She cited the pending case as her reason not to respond.

The governor’s view on this transparency fight is unknown, but he has voiced support for accountable government spending. (A spokesperson wouldn’t comment for this piece.)

In 2018, the famed investor and philanthropist Foster Friess ran against Gordon in the governor primary and won the most Republican votes but Democrat crossover votes gave Gordon the win. Friess ran on a transparency platform. After the election, Gordon promised to embrace it.

Reaching out to Friess for comment, he recounted how Republican party leaders encouraged him not to run a general election write-in campaign because Gordon was going to enact the Friess transparency platform:

“Opening the books in Wyoming was the priority of my campaign. Taxpayers deserve transparency and the ability to follow the money. We need to hold politicians accountable for tax and spend decisions. Gordon told me that he was on-board with this.”

Taxpayers have reason to be hopeful. During the Gordon administration, government in Wyoming has become a lot more transparent.

In 2019, working with the Hill Law Firm and Wyoming Equality State Taxpayers Association, we gave newly elected state auditor Kristy Racines a 30-day ultimatum to produce a state checkbook.

Racines quickly released six-years of state checkbook expenditures and refunded $8,000 in fees.  

Recently, all Wyoming public school salaries were released by the state superintendent of public instruction, Jillian Balow. Newly elected state senator Tom James led the initiative, and the salaries posted online at OpenTheBooks.com.

This isn’t our first rodeo. However, even with a few victories, the transparency battles in Wyoming are far from over.

— to www.forbes.com

Previous Post

Coronavirus and your pension: what you need to know

Next Post

HCA not against reviving pension scheme

Next Post
HCA not against reviving pension scheme

HCA not against reviving pension scheme

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED NEWS

EU Court to Consider if an Irish Pension can be Exempted from a UK Bankruptcy Estate

COVID-19: how the Financial Conduct Authority has responded

7 months ago

Cuts Of Pension Rights And Benefits 2020: Granting A One-Year Reprieve – Employment and HR

9 months ago
Single mothers, carers, the disabled and BME groups have ‘pension wealth just 15% of national average

Single mothers, carers, the disabled and BME groups have ‘pension wealth just 15% of national average

2 months ago
Unifor, Co-op end months-long pension dispute with new collective agreement

Unifor, Co-op end months-long pension dispute with new collective agreement

8 months ago

FOLLOW US

  • 81 Followers
  • 27.6k Followers

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

BROWSE BY TOPICS

2021 2021 Pensions CCP retirement check my state pension civil service pension reform Disabled pensions drawdown government policy examples uk how much is state pension lic pension plans list of government policies uk Minutes of Meeting new state pension PAB Meeting Minutes PAB Minutes Pension age pension issues pension meaning pension ombudsman pension plan pension reform definition Pensions Advisory Service Pensions Brexit pension scheme uk Pensions outlook retirement 2 million retirement pension sbi life saral pension plan calculator scams scheme funding Single mothers pensions State Pension State Pension age state pension changes state pension forecast State Pensions State triple lock the pensions regulator Therese Coffey uk pension age uk pension for eu citizens after brexit UK State Pension uk state pension age uk state pension calculator what is government policy uk

POPULAR NEWS

  • Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    5 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Exit payment cap: Implications for the LGPS

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Public Service Pensions Update | October 2020

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NEST: More than a pension | Country Report

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is the average UK retirement income?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit
  • 2021 to 2022: Employer further guide to PAYE and National Insurance contributions
  • Mortgage and me: Homeowner, 23, explains how she managed to get on London property ladder | Personal Finance | Finance

Category

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

Recent News

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

February 22, 2021
Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation newsletter – July 2020

2021 to 2022: Employer further guide to PAYE and National Insurance contributions

February 22, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.