Thursday, February 25, 2021
  • Contact
Pension Changes
  • Government Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
No Result
View All Result
Pension Changes
Home Pension Rights

Public Employees Can’t ‘Spike’ Pensions – CBS Sacramento

August 5, 2020
in Pension Rights
Public Employees Can’t ‘Spike’ Pensions – CBS Sacramento
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California’s public employees can’t pad their pensions by working extra hours and cashing out unused vacation and sick leave just before retiring, the state Supreme Court said in a ruling Thursday that gives a victory to local governments trying to contain spiraling pension obligations.

The court did not, however, wade into the bigger issue of whether governments can undo the so-called “California Rule” that dates to court decisions beginning in 1947 and holds that retirement benefits, once promised, cannot be touched.

The court found a provision of a 2013 law designed to limit “pension spiking” was “enacted for the constitutionally permissible purpose of closing loopholes and preventing abuse of the pension system,” Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye wrote in the unanimous ruling.

“Further, it would defeat this proper objective to interpret the California Rule to require county pension plans either to maintain these loopholes for existing employees or to provide comparable new pension benefits that would perpetuate the unwarranted advantages provided by these loopholes,” the court ruled.

Formulas for calculating pensions often include the average salaries for periods of employment, usually at the end of the workers’ careers.

By working extra hours and stockpiling vacation and sick time and then cashing out at retirement, some employees inflated their annual salaries and created pensions that were close to or even more than the salaries they made while working.

The California Rule ensures safe and predictable retirements for government workers. But it has limited how the state, cities, counties, schools, fire districts and others can respond to escalating pension costs spurred by generous benefits granted during better economic times and retirees living longer.

Former Gov. Jerry Brown supported the 2013 law and advocated for broader changes in the California Rule, but the justices did not touch its underlying protections.

“I think this is a big win for Jerry Brown and a big win for governments’ ability to manage pension liabilities reasonably,” said attorney Michael Colantuono, who filed a friend of the court brief in the case on behalf of the League of California Cities. “Government can change the rules, provided that it acts reasonably and for an important public purpose.”

Californians for Retirement Security, a 1.6 million-member coalition of public employee unions and retirees, said the decision “unequivocally upholds the California Rule” even as it allows local pension officials to change certain previously promised benefits. The group’s chairman, Ted Toppin, in a statement called that part of the decision “unfair and unfortunate.”

The justices have long held that pension benefits granted to existing employees cannot be diminished unless they are replaced with similar benefits, but decided that protection does not prevent legislatively enacted reforms.

Thursday’s decision in a case brought by the Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s Association against the Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Association upholds the government’s ability to regulate benefits, “while preserving the essential right to a meaningful pension,” Colantuono said. “The elimination of perceived abuses … violates nobody’s rights.”

The ruling incorporated two other similar legal challenges involving Contra Costa and Merced county employees.

Attorney David Mastagni, who represented the deputies’ association, did not immediately comment.

California’s high court last year unanimously upheld the 2013 pension reform law, ruling that buying additional retirement service credits is not one of beneficiaries’ legally protected “core pension rights.”

Cantil-Sakauye specifically noted in last year’s opinion that the court was not addressing or altering the California Rule.

The deputies’ union then argued in the current case that anyone hired before the law took effect in 2013 should still qualify for the enhanced pensions. The deputies contended that those were vested benefits and thus subject to the California Rule.

The state and local governments argued that the deputies did not have a vested, or guaranteed, right to the increased compensation, so the long-inviolate protections do not apply.

About a dozen other states have similar pension guarantees.

— to sacramento.cbslocal.com

Related posts

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

February 22, 2021
Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation newsletter – July 2020

2021 to 2022: Employer further guide to PAYE and National Insurance contributions

February 22, 2021
Previous Post

How some states are stalling pension

Next Post

How State Pension rule changes coming into effect today could delay your retirement

Next Post
How State Pension rule changes coming into effect today could delay your retirement

How State Pension rule changes coming into effect today could delay your retirement

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED NEWS

How to Find a Lost Pension Plan | Baby Boomers

How to Find a Lost Pension Plan | Baby Boomers

5 months ago
Woman wins right to late partner’s military pension in landmark ruling

Woman wins right to late partner’s military pension in landmark ruling

12 months ago
EU Court to Consider if an Irish Pension can be Exempted from a UK Bankruptcy Estate

How to be more financially savvy when getting a divorce

1 month ago
Ball Signs Agreements to Strengthen 100% European Renewable Energy Goals

Ball Signs Agreements to Strengthen 100% European Renewable Energy Goals

7 months ago

FOLLOW US

  • 81 Followers
  • 27.6k Followers

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

BROWSE BY TOPICS

2021 2021 Pensions CCP retirement check my state pension civil service pension reform Disabled pensions drawdown government policy examples uk how much is state pension lic pension plans list of government policies uk Minutes of Meeting new state pension PAB Meeting Minutes PAB Minutes Pension age pension issues pension meaning pension ombudsman pension plan pension reform definition Pensions Advisory Service Pensions Brexit pension scheme uk Pensions outlook retirement 2 million retirement pension sbi life saral pension plan calculator scams scheme funding Single mothers pensions State Pension State Pension age state pension changes state pension forecast State Pensions State triple lock the pensions regulator Therese Coffey uk pension age uk pension for eu citizens after brexit UK State Pension uk state pension age uk state pension calculator what is government policy uk

POPULAR NEWS

  • Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    5 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Exit payment cap: Implications for the LGPS

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Public Service Pensions Update | October 2020

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NEST: More than a pension | Country Report

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is the average UK retirement income?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit
  • 2021 to 2022: Employer further guide to PAYE and National Insurance contributions
  • Mortgage and me: Homeowner, 23, explains how she managed to get on London property ladder | Personal Finance | Finance

Category

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

Recent News

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

February 22, 2021
Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation newsletter – July 2020

2021 to 2022: Employer further guide to PAYE and National Insurance contributions

February 22, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.