Wednesday, March 3, 2021
  • Contact
Pension Changes
  • Government Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
No Result
View All Result
Pension Changes
Home Pension Changes

Pension-spiking showdown at California Supreme Court

May 2, 2020
in Pension Changes
Pension-spiking showdown at California Supreme Court
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The California Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday on whether to strike down pension spiking in two Bay Area counties in a case that might significantly affect future taxpayer costs for public employee retirement plans across the state.

With state and local governments crippled by escalating pension costs and badly underfunded retirement plans, and with the problem exacerbated by the current coronavirus recession, now is the time for the high court to set some reasonable boundaries.

Related posts

Freeports, green recovery and levelling up: What North West business leaders want from Budget 2021

Freeports, green recovery and levelling up: What North West business leaders want from Budget 2021

March 2, 2021
Teachers at Wycliffe College in Stroud to strike over pensions

Teachers at Wycliffe College in Stroud to strike over pensions

March 2, 2021

At the very least, the justices should strike down the pension spiking in Merced, Alameda and, most egregiously, Contra Costa counties. Abuses were so bad that some workers were retiring with pensions 25% greater than their top pay when they were on the job.

But the case also provides the high court an opportunity to reverse more than 60 years of misguided legal doctrine that prevents the state and its local governments from making reasonable adjustments to curb pension costs.

The amount of a public employee pension is based on three factors: age at retirement, years on the job and top salary, usually the last year or the average of the final three years. At issue in the legal case is what’s included in that salary.

For years, workers in the three counties were saving up their leave time, receiving cash payments for it as they prepared to retire and then counting those large payments toward their final year’s salary used in calculating their pensions.

Counting so-called “terminal pay” was legally questionable. But it had been going on for more than a decade until it was explicitly prohibited by a law signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2012.

The original version of that law contained a loophole that would have explicitly permitted such pension spiking. But when this news organization exposed the loophole lawmakers scrambled on the final day of the 2012 legislative session to pass an additional bill to fix the problem.

Labor unions soon filed lawsuits challenging that additional law, arguing that they were told they could spike their pensions when they started working and that it thus became a “vested right” that the state could not take away.

Attorneys for the governor’s office, first for Brown and now for Gavin Newsom, argue that counting such terminal pay was never legal to begin with so the workers don’t have a protected right to an illegal benefit.

The unions’ argument seeks to take advantage of misguided state Supreme Court precedence.  In a string of cases dating back more than six decades, the high court has ruled that most pension benefits enjoy constitutional protections against being reduced. The decisions have been dubbed the California Rule because their constraints on the state Legislature are greater than in most other states.

Under the California Rule, it’s widely assumed that the rate and terms under which workers earn future pension benefits cannot be reduced, even if they are too costly to taxpayers.

So, for example, if a worker starts out accruing pension benefits at 3% of final salary for every year of employment, they would be entitled to keep accruing at that rate permanently. Under this argument, salaries are not locked in for the full term of employment, but pension benefit accrual rates are – even if the employer cannot afford it.

Pension reformers, including Brown, have been urging the justices to reconsider the rigidity of the California Rule. The issue is not the pension benefits a worker has previously earned; but rather whether the worker is entitled to keep earning at the same generous level for their future work.

In the current case, the court will have three options:

• Back the unions and, by affirming the rigidity of the California Rule, essentially indefinitely lock state taxpayers into unaffordable pensions.

• Side with the state by concluding the California Rule doesn’t apply because the pension spiking was never legally permitted.

• Temper the California Rule by emphasizing that it’s not absolute and allows for reasonable pension changes, especially when the benefits are too costly for governments to fund.

The 2012 legislation was an attempt to inject some minimal limits on out-of-control behavior. It would be a travesty for the Supreme Court to permit those practices to continue.

— to www.mercurynews.com

Previous Post

State Supreme Court to Begin Hearings on Public Worker Pension Reductions Next Week

Next Post

Lagos govt pays N1.03bn accrued pension to 213 retirees

Next Post
Lagos govt pays N1.03bn accrued pension to 213 retirees

Lagos govt pays N1.03bn accrued pension to 213 retirees

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Why women facing pension delays will feel shortchanged – Ros Altmann

Why women facing pension delays will feel shortchanged – Ros Altmann

5 months ago
BE Semiconductor Industries N : Agenda item 3 – Remuneration Report 2019

Europe needs a fully fledged capital markets union – now more than ever

6 months ago
Pension contributions GAP: Pensions expert on ‘what was missed’ amid state pension changes | Personal Finance | Finance

Pension contributions GAP: Pensions expert on ‘what was missed’ amid state pension changes | Personal Finance | Finance

11 months ago
Ball Aerospace Conducts Critical Design Review for Space Force’s Next-Gen Operational Weather Satellite

Ball Aerospace Conducts Critical Design Review for Space Force’s Next-Gen Operational Weather Satellite

11 months ago

FOLLOW US

  • 81 Followers
  • 27.6k Followers

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

BROWSE BY TOPICS

2021 2021 Pensions bbc news CCP retirement check my state pension civil service pension reform Disabled pensions drawdown government policy examples uk how much is state pension lic pension plans Minutes of Meeting new state pension PAB Meeting Minutes PAB Minutes Pension age pension changes announced today pension issues pension meaning pension ombudsman pension plan pension reform definition Pensions Advisory Service Pensions Brexit pension scheme uk Pensions outlook retirement 2 million retirement pension sbi life saral pension plan calculator scams scheme funding Single mothers pensions State Pension State Pension age state pension changes state pension forecast State Pensions State triple lock the pensions regulator Therese Coffey uk pension age uk pension for eu citizens after brexit UK State Pension uk state pension age uk state pension calculator

POPULAR NEWS

  • Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    5 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Exit payment cap: Implications for the LGPS

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Public Service Pensions Update | October 2020

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is the average UK retirement income?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NEST: More than a pension | Country Report

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • Freeports, green recovery and levelling up: What North West business leaders want from Budget 2021
  • Capital Gains Tax: Rishi Sunak’s Budget may mean ‘stealth’ change to CGT | Personal Finance | Finance
  • Enfield Council slammed over £30m fossil fuel investments

Category

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

Recent News

Freeports, green recovery and levelling up: What North West business leaders want from Budget 2021

Freeports, green recovery and levelling up: What North West business leaders want from Budget 2021

March 2, 2021
Capital Gains Tax: Rishi Sunak’s Budget may mean ‘stealth’ change to CGT | Personal Finance | Finance

Capital Gains Tax: Rishi Sunak’s Budget may mean ‘stealth’ change to CGT | Personal Finance | Finance

March 2, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.