Thursday, February 25, 2021
  • Contact
Pension Changes
  • Government Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
No Result
View All Result
Pension Changes
Home Pension Rights

Pension cuts coming? Supreme Court hears California rule case

April 30, 2020
in Pension Rights
Pension cuts coming? Supreme Court hears California rule case
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Former Gov. Jerry Brown predicted two years ago that public pensions would be “on the chopping block” during the next economic downturn.

Next week, with state and local budgets teetering amid the coronavirus outbreak, the state Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could determine in part whether Brown’s prediction will come true.

Related posts

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

February 22, 2021
Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation newsletter – July 2020

2021 to 2022: Employer further guide to PAYE and National Insurance contributions

February 22, 2021

Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s Association v. Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Association, scheduled for oral arguments Tuesday, is the next big test of the so-called California rule.

The rule is a set of legal precedents dating to the 1950s that have protected public pensions from any reductions without new and equal benefits.

Dozens of unions and associations representing employees and retirees have joined the case to try to protect pensions, while local governments and organizations representing employers have joined with the state to argue pensions may under certain circumstances be reduced for workers who haven’t yet retired.

The case focuses on the pay workers receive in their last one to three years of employment, which, along with their length of public service and other factors, determines the size of their pensions.

Over the years, some public workers found creative ways to make their pensions bigger by adding pay at the end of their careers. Strategies included cashing out accrued leave balances, working hundreds of on call hours and receiving bonuses shortly before retiring.

Some local pension boards eliminated some of those tactics on their own amid the dot-com bust and the Great Recession. Brown targeted the practice, known as pension “spiking,” in a broader statewide overhaul of pension law in 2012.

Brown’s law, known as the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act, targeted end-of-career payments “paid to enhance a member’s retirement benefit.” The law said those payments couldn’t figure in pension calculations for any public employees.

The Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s Association filed a lawsuit over the change in December 2012, just before the law took effect on Jan. 1, 2013.

More flexibility on California pensions

Prior to the law, deputies were able to count as pensionable extra pay for working outside normal hours, on-call pay, accumulated leave cashouts and other types of special pay. The unions argue that anyone hired before 2013 should still be able to count those payments toward their pensions.

A sentence from a 1983 California Supreme Court decision is at the heart of the association’s argument.

“We have held that any modification of vested pension rights must be reasonable, must bear a material relation to the theory and successful operation of a pension system, and, when resulting in disadvantage to employees, must be accompanied by comparable new advantages,” the court ruled in Allen v. Board of Administration.

The deputy sheriff’s association says the word “must” is absolute and represents a “bright line” rule that helps avoid arguments over which types of pay are reasonable and which aren’t.

Interpreting it otherwise, according to the association, would allow lawmakers to favor other political priorities over workers’ promised benefits.

In recent years, California appellate courts have ruled otherwise, offering more flexibility so long as reductions are “reasonable.” Several of those decisions were appealed and ultimately the cases were combined in the Alameda case.

Attorneys representing the State of California say the association’s interpretation is far-fetched and that the California rule goes too far. In court briefings, state attorneys say the interpretation robs the Legislature of its authority over public employee compensation and its power to protect the “integrity and solvency” of public pension systems.

Schools asking for pension relief

The lawsuit centers on county-run pension systems that are independent of the largest statewide plans, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System.

Many local governments contract with CalPERS and CalSTRS to administer their pensions. The systems are about 70 percent and 64 percent funded, respectively, falling short of what the systems would need to pay all current and future obligations.

Local governments are paying more into the systems each year under long-term plans to return them to 100 percent funding, where they stood before the Great Recession.

Those payments are growing increasingly burdensome for local governments, which have to raise taxes or cut spending elsewhere when spending on pensions goes up.

With another recession likely setting because of the coronavirus, some local governments and school districts have already announced furloughs and layoffs and are requesting pension relief from the state systems.

“At a time when taxpayers are already struggling to pay for legitimate pension liabilities, they should not be forced to absorb unlawfully calculated pension liabilities as well,” state attorneys said in a 2018 brief.

The deputy sheriff’s association allows that pensions may be reduced, as long as the reductions are accounted for in a cost-neutral way through some other benefits, when reductions suit a public purpose.

“The court must look at whether the change results in a detriment to employees and, if it does, must then determine whether the change is reasonable and necessary for an important public purpose. Saving money is not an important public purpose,” association attorneys say in a legal brief.

Under emergency guidelines instituted by the court, attorneys will argue their cases Tuesday via telephone or video conference. Video of the arguments will be publicly viewable at courts.ca.gov.

Related stories from Modesto Bee


Profile Image of Wes Venteicher

Wes Venteicher anchors The Bee’s popular State Worker coverage in the newspaper’s Capitol Bureau. He covers taxes, pensions, unions, state spending and California government. A Montana native, he reported on health care and politics in Chicago and Pittsburgh before joining The Bee in 2018.

— to www.modbee.com

Previous Post

Coronavirus: Nine in ten pension funds suffer losses and annuities hit record lows

Next Post

Market reaction has dented many pension pots

Next Post

Market reaction has dented many pension pots

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Business women put their best foot forward in aid of unpaid carers

Business women put their best foot forward in aid of unpaid carers

4 months ago
Retire with guaranteed regular income by investing in Annuity Plans online

Retire with guaranteed regular income by investing in Annuity Plans online

2 weeks ago
No joy for pensions in this Budget

No joy for pensions in this Budget

11 months ago
TPO upholds late payment complaint against Bradford & Bingley

TPO upholds complaint against borough of Bromley

3 months ago

FOLLOW US

  • 81 Followers
  • 27.6k Followers

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

BROWSE BY TOPICS

2021 2021 Pensions CCP retirement check my state pension civil service pension reform Disabled pensions drawdown government policy examples uk how much is state pension lic pension plans list of government policies uk Minutes of Meeting new state pension PAB Meeting Minutes PAB Minutes Pension age pension issues pension meaning pension ombudsman pension plan pension reform definition Pensions Advisory Service Pensions Brexit pension scheme uk Pensions outlook retirement 2 million retirement pension sbi life saral pension plan calculator scams scheme funding Single mothers pensions State Pension State Pension age state pension changes state pension forecast State Pensions State triple lock the pensions regulator Therese Coffey uk pension age uk pension for eu citizens after brexit UK State Pension uk state pension age uk state pension calculator what is government policy uk

POPULAR NEWS

  • Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    5 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Exit payment cap: Implications for the LGPS

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Public Service Pensions Update | October 2020

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NEST: More than a pension | Country Report

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is the average UK retirement income?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit
  • 2021 to 2022: Employer further guide to PAYE and National Insurance contributions
  • Mortgage and me: Homeowner, 23, explains how she managed to get on London property ladder | Personal Finance | Finance

Category

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

Recent News

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

Deconstructing the Unionist myth of an independent Scotland’s deficit

February 22, 2021
Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation newsletter – July 2020

2021 to 2022: Employer further guide to PAYE and National Insurance contributions

February 22, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.