Sunday, January 17, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
Pension Changes
  • Home
  • Government Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
No Result
View All Result
Pension Changes
Home Pension Policy

Pension council rejects lower growth assumptions

July 31, 2020
in Pension Policy
Pension council rejects lower growth assumptions
0
SHARES
4
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Pension council rejects lower growth assumptions
The state Pension Funding Council voted to keep a 7.5 percent assumed rate of growth for pension assets, while State Actuary Matt Smith and others favor a lower assumption. Photo: freepik

The Pension Funding Council voted 4-2 at its July 29 meeting to keep a 7.5 percent assumed rate of growth for investments a week after the state Select Committee on Pension Policy voted to lower it based on the recommendations from State Actuary Matt Smith.

This represents the second time since September that the council has gone against Smith’s recommendation for a slightly more modest growth assumption, but one that would also require greater employer contributions from the state and public agencies.

Although the public pension systems’ unfunded liabilities have dropped substantially since last year, that is due to previously unrecognized gains. The system is currently 92.3-percent funded and has an $8.5 billion unfunded liability.

Meanwhile, the effects of the economic shutdown due to COVID 19 this year won’t impact the pension asset value until the 2023-25 biennium, according to Smith. At the same time, maintaining the 7.5 percent rate means that state and public employee contributions to the plans will go down, creating a potential shortfall.

Smith recommended a 7.4 percent assumed rate of growth for pension investments even before the COVID-19 pandemic was a factor. However, he now says that the lower rate could save the state money in the long-term but would require greater investment up front to offset lower gains.

“If the choice is to pay more later, the ultimate costs are going to depend on…the magnitude of the funding shortfalls,” he said.

Smith’s 7.4 percent recommendation is based on a 2019 economic experience study, though he said “a lot has clearly changed since.” New studies are planned for the next two years, and Smith said that those are likely to result in an even lower recommended growth rate than 7.4 percent.

Yet, local government advocates providing public comment at the meeting said it’s difficult for public employees to put even more money into the system during an economic recession. Association of Washington Cities Government Relations Director Candice Bock told the council: “we don’t want to do something now that will result in much higher rates down the road. With that being said, we are on course in an economic crisis that is hitting cities just as hard as it is hitting the state’s budget right now,” adding that keeping the assumed rate of growth at 7.5 percent “gives us perhaps a little more breathing room.”

State Office of Financial Management Director David Schumacher also favored maintaining the 7.5 percent assumption. “Even if we’re in a situation where a slightly higher assumption now means slightly more spending four or five or six years from now, I think that’s a kind of tradeoff that we should probably take pretty seriously as we’re beginning to build this next budget.”

Rep. Timm Ormsby (D-3) also voted for 7.5 percent, though he voted for a 7.4 percent rate during the state Select Committee on Pension Policy’s July 21 meeting. “All things being equal that (7.4 percent) would be a good policy, but we find ourselves in unpredictable times.”

In favor of 7.4 percent were Senate Ways and Means Committee Chair Christine Rolfes (D-23) and Ways and Means Ranking Member John Braun (R-20). Rolfes told colleagues the council should heed Smith’s advice, adding that she prefers going into the legislative session “knowing that… our i’s were dotted and our t’s were crossed.”

Braun said that the 7.4. percent rate presents a “unique opportunity to reduce our rate and reduce our risk in the future and still have savings. I don’t think we can continue to push potential costs, and therefore risk, into the future when we have an opportunity for us where both plans offer the state and local governments significant savings.”

The state legislature has the authority to change the rate adopted by the council. The next economic experience study will be completed next spring.

— to thelens.news

Related posts

Australia and Canada demand end to UK ‘frozen’ pensions

Australia and Canada demand end to UK ‘frozen’ pensions

January 15, 2021
British citizens in Canada ask government for help in pension fight

British citizens in Canada ask government for help in pension fight

January 12, 2021
Previous Post

What the CA Supreme Court pension decision means for workers

Next Post

Court Bans ‘Abusive’ Spiking, But Sticks With Pension Protections

Next Post
Court Bans ‘Abusive’ Spiking, But Sticks With Pension Protections

Court Bans 'Abusive' Spiking, But Sticks With Pension Protections

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Get Rs. 35,000 per Month after Retirement Investing in This Pension Policy; Complete Details Inside

Get Rs. 35,000 per Month after Retirement Investing in This Pension Policy; Complete Details Inside

6 months ago
Singapore keeps top spot for pension systems in Asia: Global index, Banking News & Top Stories

Singapore keeps top spot for pension systems in Asia: Global index, Banking News & Top Stories

3 months ago
Business women put their best foot forward in aid of unpaid carers

Business women put their best foot forward in aid of unpaid carers

2 months ago
‘Don’t ditch your pension for short-term hardship help’ says former minister

‘Don’t ditch your pension for short-term hardship help’ says former minister

9 months ago

FOLLOW US

  • 79 Followers
  • 27.6k Followers
  • 40.7k Subscribers

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

BROWSE BY TOPICS

2021 2021 Pensions auto-enrolment age 18 auto enrolment pension contributions 2021/22 auto enrolment rates 2020/21 auto enrolment rates 2021/22 cashing in pension at 55 cashing in pension calculator cashing in small pension pots CCP retirement check my state pension Disabled pensions drawdown employer pension contributions 2021/22 government policy examples uk list of government policies uk minimum pension contributions 2021 minimum pension contributions 2022 new state pension Pension age pension issues pension ombudsman pension plan pension regulator Pensions Advisory Service Pensions Brexit pension scheme uk Pensions outlook retirement 2 million scams scheme funding Single mothers pensions State Pension State Pension age state pension changes state pension forecast State Pensions State triple lock taking pension at 55 the pensions regulator Therese Coffey uk pension age UK State Pension uk state pension age what is government policy uk

POPULAR NEWS

  • Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    5 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Exit payment cap: Implications for the LGPS

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Public Service Pensions Update | October 2020

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NEST: More than a pension | Country Report

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Builders were not self-employed, rules employment tribunal

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
  • State pension payments can be received while working – will more tax need to be paid?
  • What is the average UK retirement income?

Category

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

Recent News

Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)

Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)

January 15, 2021

State pension payments can be received while working – will more tax need to be paid?

January 15, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.