Friday, March 5, 2021
  • Contact
Pension Changes
  • Government Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
No Result
View All Result
Pension Changes
Home Pension Policy

Jim Waters: Why no seat for taxpayers on new pension board? | Opinion

April 16, 2020
in Pension Policy
Jim Waters: Why no seat for taxpayers on new pension board? | Opinion
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A quasi-government group’s response to Gov. Andy Beshear’s signature of legislation creating a separate board for the County Employees Retirement System (CERS) — which covers local government workers and classified school personnel — illustrates the wrong-headed mindset at the heart of all of Kentucky pension woes.

“House Bill 484 creates a nine-member CERS Board of Trustees that has a singular fiduciary duty to CERS,” gushed a statement from the Kentucky League of Cities (KLC), which praised Beshear for signing the legislation and Bullitt County GOP Rep. Russell Webber for shepherding the legislation through the General Assembly.

But that statement, along with the manner in which the legislation establishes the new CERS board, reflects a longstanding philosophical flaw that fails to recognize: There are two groups involved — taxpayers as well as beneficiaries — to which all public pension board members should have “a fiduciary duty.”

KLC’s reaction, like all existing Kentucky public pension policy, prioritizes beneficiaries’ interests while diminishing those of the taxpayers who actually fund public retirement plans. 

Taxpayers in the private and nonprofit sectors not only fund state workers’ and teachers’ salaries but also the majority of their pensions, including filling the gaps when benefits are enhanced or retirement systems’ investment returns fail to meet assumptions.

Taking into account that many cities and counties were already struggling to keep up with increased pension costs during the booming Trump economy before the coronavirus’ nasty attack, how much more pressure will now be applied to the unappreciated taxpayers to fill in the COVID-19 gaps?

Considering the stock market’s recent historic and precipitous drop, prepare for the retirement systems to demand more money from Kentucky taxpayers in the form of an increased actuarially required contribution (ARC).

Shouldn’t both groups — the taxpayers who primarily fund pension systems and take all the risk as well as the members who receive all the benefits — have a seat at the table?

Yet Kentucky’s public pension systems have been unfairly established on the premise that the actuaries running the retirement plans and the boards overseeing those systems should operate largely devoid of any meaningful participation by either taxpayers or their elected officials.

The foundation for that premise is in state law itself.

KRS 61.650 states that systems’ board members and employees, including actuaries, shall act “solely in the interest of members and beneficiaries; for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to members and beneficiaries” and “impartially, taking into account any differing interests of members and beneficiaries.”

Downplaying the concerns of either group involved is unacceptable, but so is denying either group a voice.

Unlike the Teachers’ Retirement System, which includes the state treasurer — who at least voters can hold accountable for bad decisions or faulty performance — the new CERS board will lack any taxpayer representation, much less objectivity, when it comes to investment and actuarial decisions directly affecting the forgotten funders.

Three of the nine members can be current CERS beneficiaries with the other six, who, while appointed by the governor, must all come from within the system: two each from KLC and Kentucky Association of Counties — both employer agencies in the system — with the final two spots reserved for the Kentucky School Boards Association, representing local boards of education that also are CERS employers.

Just as it would be wrong to disregard the concerns of teachers and state workers and their union leaders and allies regarding their compensation and benefits, it’s equally unfair to deny taxpayers outside the public sphere who provide the majority of funding and take all the risk a seat at the table.

Doesn’t the commonwealth have a “fiduciary duty” to them as well?

Jim Waters is president and CEO of the Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions, a free-market think tank. He can be reached at jwaters@freedomkentucky.com and @bipps on Twitter.

— to www.state-journal.com

Related posts

Enfield Council slammed over £30m fossil fuel investments

Enfield Council slammed over £30m fossil fuel investments

March 2, 2021
What does the Budget have in store for the pension industry?

What does the Budget have in store for the pension industry?

March 1, 2021
Previous Post

German pensions lifeboat preps for insolvencies burden amid reform | News

Next Post

Can COVID-19 economic impact justify reopening your divorce settlement?

Next Post
EU Court to Consider if an Irish Pension can be Exempted from a UK Bankruptcy Estate

Can COVID-19 economic impact justify reopening your divorce settlement?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Acting DNI declassifies list of Obama administration officials ‘involved in unmasking Michael Flynn’

Acting DNI declassifies list of Obama administration officials ‘involved in unmasking Michael Flynn’

10 months ago
EU Court to Consider if an Irish Pension can be Exempted from a UK Bankruptcy Estate

EIOPA issues Statement on Principles to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the Occupational Pensions Sector

10 months ago
Nissan workers to vote on pension changes

Nissan workers to vote on pension changes

5 months ago
A widow, 83, receives £115k after ANOTHER state pension error

A widow, 83, receives £115k after ANOTHER state pension error

7 months ago

FOLLOW US

  • 81 Followers
  • 27.6k Followers

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

BROWSE BY TOPICS

2021 2021 Pensions bbc news CCP retirement check my state pension civil service pension reform Disabled pensions drawdown government policy examples uk how much is state pension lic pension plans Minutes of Meeting new state pension PAB Meeting Minutes PAB Minutes Pension age pension changes announced today pension issues pension meaning pension ombudsman pension plan pension reform definition Pensions Advisory Service Pensions Brexit pension scheme uk Pensions outlook retirement 2 million retirement pension sbi life saral pension plan calculator scams scheme funding Single mothers pensions State Pension State Pension age state pension changes state pension forecast State Pensions State triple lock the pensions regulator Therese Coffey uk pension age uk pension for eu citizens after brexit UK State Pension uk state pension age uk state pension calculator

POPULAR NEWS

  • Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    5 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Exit payment cap: Implications for the LGPS

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Public Service Pensions Update | October 2020

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is the average UK retirement income?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NEST: More than a pension | Country Report

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • EU wants employers to report pay levels to fix gender gap
  • EU wants employers to disclose wages to close gender pay gap | Business and Economy News
  • Setting the standard Lifetime Allowance from 2021 to 2022 to 2025 to 2026

Category

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

Recent News

EU wants employers to report pay levels to fix gender gap

EU wants employers to report pay levels to fix gender gap

March 5, 2021
EU wants employers to disclose wages to close gender pay gap | Business and Economy News

EU wants employers to disclose wages to close gender pay gap | Business and Economy News

March 5, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.