Friday, January 15, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
Pension Changes
  • Home
  • Government Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
No Result
View All Result
Pension Changes
Home Pension Rights

Could transparency of pay be your beacon in troubled times?

April 30, 2020
in Pension Rights
EU Court to Consider if an Irish Pension can be Exempted from a UK Bankruptcy Estate
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Business are looking at their peers, their customers and their supply chains to see what they can discover at this time. One exciting area for consideration is attracting and retaining the best talent. Many businesses are anticipating restructuring or other fundamental changes in the next year. That can result in a pool of talent becoming available that businesses could not have dreamt of in pre-COVID-19 times. So…what is the best talent looking for in the current market? Are women looking for different things to men? Are different generations looking for different things? What about a desire for employees to be paid equally to those of the other gender for doing like work?

When looking at equal pay, there may be little difference in generations, as this year marks 50 years since the introduction of the Equal Pay Act. However, few businesses believe pay transparency would be easy for them, even now. Principally, the concern is the risk of litigation if they reveal skeletons in their closet. However, anecdotally, entrepreneurial and forward-looking businesses that have already effected such changes have reported positive outcomes. The secret appears to be to combine transparency with a real focus on setting objective performance criteria to measure performance. One for the thought bank…

If you are trying to attract and retain female talent, you need to consider the embarrassment factor. Just a month before the commencement of the job retention scheme, the Fawcett Society was reminding us that only 24% of people they surveyed reported that salaries were discussed openly in their workplace and 52% of women would be embarrassed to ask their male colleagues how much they earn.

Businesses should be careful not to delay in this area, given the government’s decision to suspend gender pay gap reporting obligations this year. That measure is truly relevant to the COVID-19 ”survival” phase (alleviating a pressure point for businesses). This will return to focus and, by that time, you may be behind the curve.

Eventually your hand may be revealed in any event. It may be better to use this as a selling point for your organisation by doing something now.

The Fawcett Society is backing a private members bill which aims to introduce a new ”right to know” what a comparator is paid and what their terms of employment or engagement are. The idea is that the current measures do not work without transparency. This is also billed to be a way to avoid the need for colleagues to have backdoor conversations in order to obtain the information they require.

The right would extend to workers. They would only need to suspect that their colleague (within the organisation) is a comparator for equal pay purposes to make a request. The employer would need to provide defined information within 20 days. The information that could be requested would potentially include information about the comparator’s salary, benefit, bonus, overtime, allowances in respect of shift working and standby time, bank holidays and time off in lieu, attendance pay and performance-related pay. There is also proposed to be a less specific catch-all of “any other terms related to equal pay”. The bill envisages that employees would be permitted access to a comparator’s Form P60 as well as job descriptions and job evaluation studies carried out by the employer.Employees would have the ability to make multiple requests in respect of different comparators.

There are penalties proposed for employers who do not comply.

There are also proposals including a tribunal ordering full costs and expenses if the individual goes on to make a successful disclosure application. There is also a suggestion that the tribunal may order that the material factor defence is not available to the extent that the employer has not provided information about particular terms. There is a proposal that any costs would be paid by the employer within 28 days. If the employer failed, it would be debarred against defending a subsequent claim.

In addition to the above, the bill also proposes a number of other measures including:

  • extending transparency by extending gender pay gap reporting to companies with 100 employees or more;
  • requiring employers to publish an action plan to tackle gender pay gaps;
  • reforming remedies and time limits in respect of equal pay;
  • providing a right to equal pay where a single source can rectify unequal pay (at present the European Union underpins this, but the Fawcett Society considers it to be at risk in the Brexit separation);
  • revising the statutory statement of particulars (section 1 Employment Rights Act) to include equal pay;
  • giving claimants back their lost pension rights and an injury to feelings award when they win a claim; and
  • placing obligations on certain employers to publish information on pay between employees of different ethnic origins, as well as between male and female employees.

Private members bills do not always get the greatest traction and the bill is currently only at the second reading stage in the House of Lords. Therefore, it is at an early stage in its legislative journey. It is highly unlikely that it will be in a position to get immediate airtime given the need for immediate COVID-19-related measures. The question is whether there is an appetite for these changes once COVID-19 has settled. Assuming there is a desire for change, the delay gives businesses an opportunity to get ahead. Businesses can decide on their own terms the extent of any changes they want to make in this area. In a time when people feel a real sense of community, changes that bring unity may appear much more profound. Who does not want to be the organisation that talent looks to and says are ahead of the curve?

— to www.lexology.com

Related posts

Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)

Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)

January 15, 2021
Guest comment: Credit where it’s due

Guest comment: Credit where it’s due

January 15, 2021
Previous Post

Pension funds suffer record losses as Covid-19 hits

Next Post

DC versus DB schemes during the crisis

Next Post

DC versus DB schemes during the crisis

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Coronavirus: Nine in ten pension funds suffer losses and annuities hit record lows

Coronavirus: Nine in ten pension funds suffer losses and annuities hit record lows

9 months ago

State pension payments can be received while working – will more tax need to be paid?

4 hours ago
Proposed divorce legislation could damage women’s retirement savings – Quilter

Chancellor’s economic update may ‘pave the way’ for more significant changes – Aegon

6 months ago
Ball Corporation Announces Approval of Science Based Targets to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Ball Corporation Prices $1.3 Billion of Senior Notes

5 months ago

FOLLOW US

  • 79 Followers
  • 27.6k Followers
  • 40.7k Subscribers

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

BROWSE BY TOPICS

2021 2021 Pensions auto-enrolment age 18 auto enrolment pension contributions 2021/22 auto enrolment rates 2020/21 auto enrolment rates 2021/22 cashing in pension at 55 cashing in pension calculator cashing in small pension pots CCP retirement check my state pension Disabled pensions drawdown employer pension contributions 2021/22 government policy examples uk list of government policies uk minimum pension contributions 2021 minimum pension contributions 2022 new state pension Pension age pension issues pension ombudsman pension plan pension regulator Pensions Advisory Service Pensions Brexit pension scheme uk Pensions outlook retirement 2 million scams scheme funding Single mothers pensions State Pension State Pension age state pension changes state pension forecast State Pensions State triple lock taking pension at 55 the pensions regulator Therese Coffey uk pension age UK State Pension uk state pension age what is government policy uk

POPULAR NEWS

  • Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    Multiemployer pension reform not happening this year

    5 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Exit payment cap: Implications for the LGPS

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Public Service Pensions Update | October 2020

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NEST: More than a pension | Country Report

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Builders were not self-employed, rules employment tribunal

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
  • State pension payments can be received while working – will more tax need to be paid?
  • What is the average UK retirement income?

Category

  • Government Pension Policy
  • Pension Changes
  • Pension Information
  • Pension Policy
  • Pension Rights
  • Retirement Pension
  • Uncategorized

Recent News

Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)

Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)

January 15, 2021

State pension payments can be received while working – will more tax need to be paid?

January 15, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home

© 2020 Please contact us on partnership@pensionchanges.co.uk if you would like to reach our audience.